A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
People can often outperform statistical methods and machine learning algorithms in situations that involve making inferences about the relationship between causes and effects. While people are remarkably good at causal reasoning in many situations, there are several instances where they deviate from expected responses. This paper examines three situations where judgments related to causal inference problems produce unexpected results and describes a quantum inference model based on the axiomatic principles of quantum probability theory that can explain these effects. Two of the three phenomena arise from the comparison of predictive judgments (i.e., the conditional probability of an effect given a cause) with diagnostic judgments (i.e., the conditional probability of a cause given an effect). The third phenomenon is a new finding examining order effects in predictive causal judgments. The quantum inference model uses the notion of incompatibility among different causes to account for all three phenomena. Psychologically, the model assumes that individuals adopt different points of view when thinking about different causes. The model provides good fits to the data and offers a coherent account for all three causal reasoning effects thus proving to be a viable new candidate for modeling human judgment.
منابع مشابه
A Quantum Probability Approach to Human Causal Reasoning
When people make inferences about causal situations with vague and imperfect information, their judgments often deviate from the normative prescription of classical probability. As a result, it is difficult to apply popular models of causal reasoning such as ∆P and causal power, which provide good accounts of behavior in casual learning tasks and tasks where statistical information is provided ...
متن کاملA latent-mixture quantum probability model of causal reasoning within a Bayesian inference framework
We develop a quantum probability model that can account for situations where people’s causal judgments violate the properties of causal Bayes nets and demonstrate how the parameters of our model can be interpreted to provide information about underlying cognitive processes. We implement this model within a hierarchical Bayesian inference framework that allows us to systematically identify indiv...
متن کاملA Quantum Bayes Net Approach to Causal Reasoning
When individuals have little knowledge about a causal system and must make causal inferences based on vague and imperfect information, their judgments often deviate from the normative prescription of classical probability. Previously, many researchers have dealt with violations of normative rules by elaborating causal Bayesian networks through the inclusion of hidden variables. While these mode...
متن کاملWhen are representations of causal events quantum versus classical?
Throughout our lives, we are faced with a variety of causal reasoning problems. Arguably, the most successful models of causal reasoning, Causal Graphical Models (CGMs), perform well in some situations, but there is considerable variation in how well they are able to account for data, both across scenarios and between individuals. We propose a model of causal reasoning based on quantum probabil...
متن کاملQuantum Models of Human Causal Reasoning 1 Running head: QUANTUM MODELS OF HUMAN CAUSAL REASONING Quantum Models of Human Causal Reasoning
Throughout our lives, we are constantly faced with a variety of causal reasoning problems. A challenge for cognitive modelers is developing a comprehensive framework for modeling causal reasoning across different types of tasks and levels of causal complexity. Causal graphical models (CGMs), based on Bayes’ calculus, have perhaps been the most successful at explaining and predicting judgments o...
متن کامل